19.org - Islamic Theory of Evolution (Shanavas)









Search Preview

Islamic Theory of Evolution (Shanavas) – 19.org

19.org
19.org Faith not supported by reason and empirical evidence is wishful thinking Menu Skip to content Home Books Brainbow Book
.org > 19.org

SEO audit: Content analysis

Language Error! No language localisation is found.
Title Islamic Theory of Evolution (Shanavas) – 19.org
Text / HTML ratio 51 %
Frame Excellent! The website does not use iFrame solutions.
Flash Excellent! The website does not have any flash contents.
Keywords cloud evolution Muslim theory Quran God selection creation million Darwin scientific scientists laws Evolution Muhammad Edip human time life book clay
Keywords consistency
Keyword Content Title Description Headings
evolution 34
Muslim 24
theory 17
Quran 15
God 15
selection 15
Headings
H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 H6
10 1 0 0 0 0
Images We found 6 images on this web page.

SEO Keywords (Single)

Keyword Occurrence Density
evolution 34 1.70 %
Muslim 24 1.20 %
theory 17 0.85 %
Quran 15 0.75 %
God 15 0.75 %
selection 15 0.75 %
creation 14 0.70 %
million 14 0.70 %
Darwin 12 0.60 %
scientific 12 0.60 %
scientists 12 0.60 %
laws 11 0.55 %
Evolution 11 0.55 %
Muhammad 10 0.50 %
Edip 10 0.50 %
human 10 0.50 %
time 10 0.50 %
life 10 0.50 %
book 10 0.50 %
clay 9 0.45 %

SEO Keywords (Two Word)

Keyword Occurrence Density
of the 37 1.85 %
of evolution 20 1.00 %
theory of 15 0.75 %
to the 14 0.70 %
the Quran 13 0.65 %
in the 13 0.65 %
the theory 12 0.60 %
and the 11 0.55 %
million million 11 0.55 %
as a 9 0.45 %
by the 9 0.45 %
of a 8 0.40 %
the same 8 0.40 %
as the 7 0.35 %
of Evolution 6 0.30 %
of life 6 0.30 %
Theory of 6 0.30 %
with the 6 0.30 %
cumulative selection 6 0.30 %
of creation 6 0.30 %

SEO Keywords (Three Word)

Keyword Occurrence Density Possible Spam
theory of evolution 15 0.75 % No
the theory of 11 0.55 % No
million million million 8 0.40 % No
of the Quran 6 0.30 % No
Islamic Theory of 5 0.25 % No
Theory of Evolution 5 0.25 % No
in the West 4 0.20 % No
the idea of 3 0.15 % No
Sunni and Shiite 3 0.15 % No
Muslim scientists and 3 0.15 % No
the power of 3 0.15 % No
came into existence 3 0.15 % No
the origin of 3 0.15 % No
of Human Rights 2 0.10 % No
the history of 2 0.10 % No
in our creation 2 0.10 % No
I would like 2 0.10 % No
on this planet 2 0.10 % No
would like to 2 0.10 % No
of Muslim scientists 2 0.10 % No

SEO Keywords (Four Word)

Keyword Occurrence Density Possible Spam
the theory of evolution 11 0.55 % No
million million million million 5 0.25 % No
Islamic Theory of Evolution 5 0.25 % No
the West by the 2 0.10 % No
Theory of Evolution Shanavas 2 0.10 % No
many facts and events 2 0.10 % No
Missing Link between Darwin 2 0.10 % No
known in the West 2 0.10 % No
you will most likely 2 0.10 % No
bet your entire wealth 2 0.10 % No
Dogmatic Skepticism and Organized 2 0.10 % No
Skepticism and Organized Atheism 2 0.10 % No
in the West by 2 0.10 % No
a million million million 2 0.10 % No
West by the name 2 0.10 % No
My Normal and Paranormal 2 0.10 % No
Normal and Paranormal Adventures 2 0.10 % No
the Origin of Species 2 0.10 % No
and the Origin of 2 0.10 % No
Darwin and the Origin 2 0.10 % No

Internal links in - 19.org

Books
Books – 19.org
Brainbow Book List
Brainbow Book List – 19.org
Quran: a Reformist Translation
Quran: a Reformist Translation – 19.org
NINETEEN: God’s Signature
NINETEEN: God’s Signature – 19.org
Islamic Theory of Evolution (Shanavas)
Islamic Theory of Evolution (Shanavas) – 19.org
Authors
Authors – 19.org
Edip Yüksel
Edip Yüksel – 19.org
Abdur Rab
Abdur Rab – 19.org
Arnold Mol
Arnold Mol – 19.org
Asghar Ali Engineer
Asghar Ali Engineer – 19.org
Kassim Ahmad
Kassim Ahmad – 19.org
Reaz Islam
Reaz Islam – 19.org
Videos
Videos – 19.org
Organization
Organization – 19.org
Contact
Contact – 19.org
Associates and Affiliates
Associates and Affiliates – 19.org
Download
Download – 19.org
114 Movement
114 Movement – 19.org
Update Info
Update Info – 19.org
Conferences
Conferences – 19.org
1. MANIFESTO
1. MANIFESTO – 19.org
2. CONSTITUTION
2. CONSTITUTION – 19.org
3. AUDIO-VIDEO
3. AUDIO-VIDEO – 19.org
4. BOOKS
4. BOOKS – 19.org
5. EDIP YUKSEL
5. EDIP YUKSEL – 19.org
0. Who is Edip Yuksel
0. Who is Edip Yuksel – 19.org
19: God's Signature
19: God’s Signature – 19.org
Christianity
Christianity – 19.org
Debates and Interviews
Debates and Interviews – 19.org
Ali Sina
Ali Sina – 19.org
Enemies of Muhammad
Enemies of Muhammad – 19.org
Family
Family – 19.org
Law and Politics
Law and Politics – 19.org
Journal Articles
Journal Articles – 19.org
Organizations, sects and cults
Organizations, sects and cults – 19.org
Paranormal
Paranormal – 19.org
Philosophy
Philosophy – 19.org
Philosophy teaching
Philosophy teaching – 19.org
Prime Argument
Prime Argument – 19.org
QRT
QRT – 19.org
Rainbow
Rainbow – 19.org
Sala prayer
Sala prayer – 19.org
Theology
Theology – 19.org
Visual Articles
Visual Articles – 19.org
Warmongers
Warmongers – 19.org
Women
Women – 19.org
6. STUDENTS
6. STUDENTS – 19.org
Syllabi
Syllabi – 19.org
7. AFFILIATES
7. AFFILIATES – 19.org
Abdun Nur
Abdun Nur – 19.org
Abdur Rab
Abdur Rab – 19.org
Aisha Musa
Aisha Musa – 19.org
Asghar Ali Engineer
Asghar Ali Engineer – 19.org
Basma Khalifa
Basma Khalifa – 19.org
Fereydoun Taslimi
Fereydoun Taslimi – 19.org
Hasan Mahmoud
Hasan Mahmoud – 19.org
Irshad Manji
Irshad Manji – 19.org
Kassim Ahmad
Kassim Ahmad – 19.org
Lambda
Lambda – 19.org
Lily Ghobady
Lily Ghobady – 19.org
Reaz Islam
Reaz Islam – 19.org
Ruby Amatulla
Ruby Amatulla – 19.org
T.O. Shanavas
T.O. Shanavas – 19.org
Tuna Ulas
Tuna Ulas – 19.org
8. OTHER PROGRESSIVE AUTHORS
8. OTHER PROGRESSIVE AUTHORS – 19.org
David Phillips
David Phillips – 19.org
W. N. Arafat
W. N. Arafat – 19.org
9. GENERAL
9. GENERAL – 19.org
Law and Politics @fa
Law and Politics @fa – 19.org
PORTUGUESE
PORTUGUESE – 19.org
Sonia Cihangir
Sonia Cihangir – 19.org
Lecture at British Parliament and Oslo Conference
Lecture at British Parliament and Oslo Conference – 19.org
Muslim Reform or Become Extinct
Muslim Reform or Become Extinct – 19.org
From Gerd Puin to Edip Yuksel
From Gerd Puin to Edip Yuksel – 19.org
Erdogan and his thugs
Erdogan and his thugs – 19.org
Reformist Translation vs Sectarian Translations
Reformist Translation vs Sectarian Translations – 19.org
NINETEEN: God’s Signature in Nature and Scripture. EXAMPLES:
NINETEEN: God’s Signature in Nature and Scripture. EXAMPLES: – 19.org
Sam Gerrans and Code 19
Sam Gerrans and Code 19 – 19.org
Year 1974: the Historic Discovery and Announcement by Rashad Khalifa
Year 1974: the Historic Discovery and Announcement by Rashad Khalifa – 19.org
Divine Logic
Divine Logic – 19.org
Islamofacism-2
Islamofacism-2 – 19.org
Islamofacism-1
Islamofacism-1 – 19.org
Irshad Manji
Irshad Manji – 19.org
Edip Yuksel v. Ali Sina
Edip Yuksel v. Ali Sina – 19.org
The illegitimate child of 9 beasts
The illegitimate child of 9 beasts – 19.org
Loneliness Uncovered
Loneliness Uncovered – 19.org
Rashad Khalifa – Masjid Tucson 1919
Rashad Khalifa – Masjid Tucson 1919 – 19.org
Edip Yuksel
Edip Yuksel – 19.org
What Motivates ISIS?
What Motivates ISIS? – 19.org
In Defense of Rashad Khalifa against Slanderers
In Defense of Rashad Khalifa against Slanderers – 19.org
Idiots v Idiotmeters or I.Q. IQ TESTS
Idiots v Idiotmeters or I.Q. IQ TESTS – 19.org
Fatwa against Islamic Reform
Fatwa against Islamic Reform – 19.org

19.org Spined HTML


Islamic Theory ofIncubation(Shanavas) – 19.org 19.org Faith not supported by reason and empirical vestige is wishful thinking Menu Skip to content Home Books BrainbowTypesettingList Quran: a Reformist Translation NINETEEN: God’s Signature Islamic Theory ofIncubation(Shanavas) Authors Edip Yüksel Abdur Rab Arnold Mol Asghar Ali Engineer Kassim Ahmad Reaz Islam Videos Organization Contact Associates and Affiliates Download 114 Movement Registration Update Info Islamic Theory ofIncubation(Shanavas) Islamic Theory of Evolution: The Missing Link between Darwin and the Origin of Species Click on the picture to order a reprinting of it from Amazon.comTypesettingReview: Edip Yuksel I stipulate with Dr. Shanavas’ main thesis that the anti-evolutionary stand promoted by trendy Sunni and Shiite scholars contradicts the teachings of the Quran, as well as the scientific vestige and many of the prominent Muslim scholars who preceded Darwin. Like every book, this one too should be studied with an unshut mind and with hair-trigger reasoning, a natural epistemology which the Quran reminds us to use at 39:18 and 17:36. This typesetting was previously published under the titleIncubationand/or Creation: an Islamic Perspective. We decided to publish the revised version under a new title, Islamic Theory of Evolution: the Missing Link between Darwin and the Origin of Species. The imbricate picture is not meant to disparage or vilify Darwin, but it is meant to describe the worldwide vein among the proponents of theory of evolution, as they ignore the important contribution of Muslim scientists and they vituperate the theory by associating it with unwarranted philosophical conclusions such as atheism. We consider Darwin as one of the greatest scientists who unknowingly followed the instructions of the Quran in 29:19-20 (See, below). In this book, Dr. Shanavas defends the theory of incubation both scientifically and theologically and provides historical preliminaries that has been eradicated from public memory. Though a unconfined majority of people, regardless of their religion, consider Darwin as the originator of the idea of evolution, Shanavas reminds us that Darwin (1809-1882) and his grandfather Erasmus Darwin were influenced by the work of Muslim scientists who lived centuries surpassing them. For instance, Dr. Shanavas quotes from John William Draper (1812-1883), first president of American Chemical Society, a trendy of Darwin, and a former president of New York University summarizes the deliberately induced wonk amnesia in the West. Draper acknowledges the fact that Muslims described the theory of incubation in their schools centuries surpassing the West did: “I have to deplore the systematic manner in which the literature of Europe has contrived to put out of sight our scientific obligations to the Muhammadans. Surely they cannot be much longer hidden. Injustice founded on religious rancor and national conceit cannot be perpetuated forever.”(Draper, John William. The IntellectualMinutiaeof Europe, p. 42.) “[Christian] theological authorities were therefore constrained to squint with disfavor on any struggle to siphon when the origin of the earth to an epoch indefinitely remote, and on the Muhammadan theory of incubation which supposed that human beings ripened over a long period of time from lower forms of life to the present condition.” “Sometimes, not without surprise, we meet the ideas with which we flatter ourselves with having originated our own times. Thus our modern doctrine of incubation and minutiae were taught their [Muslim] schools. In fact they carried them much farther than we are tending to do, extending them plane inorganic and minerals.” (The History of the Conflict between Religion and Science, John William Draper, pp. 118, 187-188.) Ironically, this Western amnesia regarding the scientific contribution of muslims coincided with the ripen in Muslim world. By withdrawing rational thinking and scientific methodology which is equal to Quran is the necessary condition for stuff a muslim, they followed dogmas and story tellers. Will Durant, an American historian, reminds his readers that medical books authored by Ali Ibni Sina (980-1037) and Abu Bakr Muhammad ibn Zakariya al-Razi (844-926) were both used as textbooks in European universities for centuries, and that in 1395 Razi’s typesetting Kitab al-Hawi was among the nine textbooks used by the University of Paris. The same typesetting informs the reader that Avicenna’s Qanun fil Tibb, a science encyclopedia, was a main textbook at Montpelier and Louvain universities until the mid-17th century. We should mention two important Muslim scientists who had immense impact on scientific enterprise in Europe: Abu Bakr ibn Tufayl, known in the West as Abubacer (1107-1185) and philosopher Abu al-Walid Muhammad ibn Rushd who became famous in the West by the name Averroes (1126-1298). Muslim scientists and philosophers of the medieval period had no qualms in unsuspicious incubation as a divine system for creation. For instance, the prominent Muslim polymath, philosopher and sociologist Ibni Khaldun (1332-1406), without a paragraph well-nigh the origin of human species, reminds the reader with a verse describing the deterministic nature of God’s system: “You will never find a transpiration in God’s system.” In his famous typesetting Muqaddimah, Ibni Khaldun proposes a theory of incubation starting from minerals. Minerals, equal to Ibn Khaldun, evolve and wilt seeded and seedless plants. Plants evolve and reach to their zenith with palm trees and vines. The incubation continues with snails and shelled sea animals. The diversification in unprepossessing kingdom reaches the zenith of megacosm by gradual incubation into human beings with consciousness and thinking skills.Equalto Ibn Khaldun, monkeys are the link between animals and the first stage of humanity. Ibn Khaldun presents the theory of incubation by using scientific language, arguing that the essence of megacosm (in modern terminology: genetic code) passes through various changes (mutations) generating one species without another. In wing to these, Muhammad al-Haytham (965-1039), who is known in the West by the name Alhazen, defends human incubation starting from minerals, plants, and animals in Kitabal Manazer, his typesetting on optical science. Prominent leaders of Sufism such as Ibn Arabi (1165-1240) and Jaluluddin Rumi (1207-1273) moreover had no problem in unsuspicious the idea of megacosm through evolution, an idea which was wontedly held among Muslims. The Muslim Geologist al-Biruni (973-1048) in his typesetting Kitab al-Jamahir moreover asserts that humans are created without long periods of incubation from simple organisms through natural selection. Unfortunately, violent suppression of self-ruling speech and enforcement of anti-Quranic whoredom law by Muslim rulers and their hand-picked Sunni and Shiite scholars plunged the Muslim world into a visionless age. Great Muslim scientists and philosophers such as Ibn Khaldun, Ibn Sina, and Ibn Rushd were later condemned as heretics and apostates. At present, Muslims towards to have lost their worthiness to grasp the fact that they live in a visionless age. A pilgrimage similar to the one waged by the Catholic Church versus the heliocentric model promoted by Copernicus and Galileo is now stuff waged versus the theory of incubation identified by the western scientist Darwin. Ironically, Sunni and Shiite apologists have established an syndication versus science with wrong-wing Evangelical Christians. A frontrunner of the Sunni pilgrimage versus the theory of incubation is  a Turkish cult leader who puts his brand-name on dozens of fancy books written, edited, concocted, or plagiarized by his followers who, equal to various Turkish newspapers, were snatched from their rich families by cult members while they were in upper school or college. I have exposed the modus operandi of this weft in an article, as he cleverly picked Jews andIncubationas his two main subjects in his yearing to declare himself as a Muslim demagogue. Appealing and provoking the religious and anticlastic emotions of Muslim population, the cult published books and wares on Jews and Masons, spewing misinformation and racist hatred. The cult moreover published books denouncing evolution. This mahdi wanna-be became a notoriously loud voice of a reactionary segment of the Muslim population. He owes his success to many factors, which include his cult’s vast financial resources, his self-importance, the zeal of his followers who are brainwashed into yoyo that they are the chosen few who will squire the Mahdi, and the ignorance theirs among his target audience. A few years ago, I wrote a philosophical vendible titled TheVeilingWatch-watchers or Smell the Cheese: An Intelligent and DeliciousTreatisefor IntelligentDiamondin Evolution. I included the vendible among the appendices of the Quran: a Reformist Translation. I argued that undisciplined to the claims of religious people and atheists, visa of the theory of incubation does not reduce the power of arguments for God’s existence, including the teleological argument.Incubationof species through mutation and cumulative selection, as subscribed to by the modern scientific community, provides sufficient vestige for the existence of immanent intelligent diamond in nature. The vendible elicited strong reactions from fanatic adherents of both groups.Unelevatedare two excerpts from the article: IN SUM, millions of organic and inorganic compounds, including the ones that yet to be discovered, with their unshared chemical and physical characteristics, must be the materialization of the information immanent in the tiniest towers woodcut of the universe, that is, Hydrogen. Going backwards, the same qualities must be imputed for the most fundamental subatomic particle. No wonder Heraclitus had brilliantly inferred that intrinsic law permeating the universe, and tabbed it “logos.” Furthermore, when a particular combination of a particular set of elements in particular proportions and order generates the function we undeniability life, the laws or rules of such an event must have existed surpassing the event occurred. In other words, the laws and rules determining how a particular DNA sequence would behave must have preceded the very occurrence of the event. Why should a particular configuration of particular molecules made of a particular combination of elements lead to a lamina or a living organism? Who or what unswayable such a magical configuration? None, just chance? No, not a chance! No, not by a chance!Endangermentdoes not lead to laws. In fact, endangerment itself is subject to the laws of probability. The laws dominating the universe came into existence with the first moment of Big Bang. If you bet your unshortened wealth in a casino you will most likely lose it and you will deserve the title of “another mathematically challenged person” and you may plane receive a silver medal in the next Darwin’s Award. But you can bet your unshortened wealth on a scientific prediction based on natural laws and you will most likely win. It is considering of the natural laws of rationalization and effect that scientists can employ reason and predict events. Mendeleyev knew that elements were not vicarial haphazardly, so he discovered the periodical table. Thus, it is irrelevant how many millions or billions of years passed surpassing the first organism came into existence among random and upturned uniting of chemical and physical events. Starting from the first seconds of megacosm of material particles 13.7 billion years ago, the pre-conditions and laws of life must have come into existence too. What scientists do is not inventing, they merely discover. Scientists do not invent laws of physics or chemistry; they learn those laws bit by bit, without tedious experimentation, and based on the information they reap they put together the pieces of Lego. The characteristics of each newly discovered shape was coded in their nature since the whence of the universe. Thus, when a veiling watch-watcher refers to the age of the world and its size to explain the marvels of veiling cumulative selection, we should not be blindly unsuspicious his argument. The information or laws of life existed billions years surpassing the emergence of life. So, we should demand an subtitle regarding the a priori information creating the diamond of living organisms. … Dawkins provides probability calculations of a random work on a computer using 26 alphabet reports and a space bar, totaling 27 characters. To randomly type Hamlet’s 28-character statement, METHINKS IT IS LIKE A WEASEL, it would take 27 to the power of 28 key strokes, which would be a very small odd, well-nigh 1 in 10,000 million million million million million million. Instead of single-step selection of random variation, Dawkins suggests us to program the computer to use cumulative selection. The computer generates some random 28 notation and selects the one that most resembles the target phrase, METHINKS… “What matters is the difference between the time taken by cumulative selection, and the time which the same computer, working unappetizing out at the same rate, would take to reach the target phrase if it were forced to use the other procedure of single-step selection: well-nigh a million million million million million years. This is increasingly than a million million million times as long as the universe has so far existed. … Whereas the time taken for a computer working randomly but with the constraint of cumulative selection to perform the same task is of the same order as humans ordinarily can understand, between 11 seconds and the times it takes to have lunch… If evolutionary progress had had to rely on single-step selection, it would have never got anywhere. If, however, there was any way in which the necessary conditions for cumulative selection could have been set up by the veiling forces of nature, strange and wonderful might have been the consequences. As a matter of fact that is exactly what happened on this planet, and we ourselves are among the most recent, if not the strangest and most wonderful, of those consequences.” (Richard Dawkins, TheVeilingWatchmaker, Norton, 1987, p.49) Though he is a unexceptionable and yacky scientist, Dawkins takes too many facts and events for granted without plane mentioning them: such as the number of characters, their proportion, the computer programmer and program that selects the right characters, the energy that accomplishes the work, the material that make up characters, time and space, the continuity of their existence, etc. In the pursuit page, Dawkins distinguishes his METHINKS example from the live evolutionary process. “Evolution has no long-term goal. There is no long-distance target, no final perfection to serve as a yardstick for selection, although human vanity cherishes the wacky notion that our species is the final goal of evolution. … The ‘watchmaker’ that is cumulative natural selection is veiling to the future and has no long-term goal.” (Id, p.50). Here Dawkins acknowledges that he widow his intelligence and teleological intention by determining a target, yardstick for selection. Thus, Dawkins takes for granted many facts and events, and gives an illustration of a simple computer program in which he interjects his intelligence, a target, and a selection yardstick to explain something that equal to him has none of them. As some scientists have allergy to the idea of considering God, many religious people are eager to ignore the overwhelming evidences supporting the theory of evolution. Why is it that some people cannot winnow the theory of incubation from primates? Though they have no problem with incubation from a waif of stinky white substance and an embryo, from a frog-like fetus, or from a victual who tries to suck everything in tropical proximity, they cannot fathom a chimpanzee to be their afar cousin? I would like to share with you a paragraph from Hulusi Başar Çelebi, a participant of the Turkish forum at 19.org. In response to a Sunni critic of my vendible defending the theory of evolution, he wrote the following: “Which one is a increasingly serious business: eradicating the taboos or protecting them? Monkey, or cat, snake or bat… What lowly animals, aren’t they? They stink like carcass and walk on dirty lands. My stomach is revolting! As for the human beings, they are unrenowned as far as their persons are involved. They smell like roses and flowers. Made up from entirely variegated substances… Perfect skin, with no hair or hormones… They are odorless and transparent. Spill milk on their persons and lick it. Do not situate their sufferer bodies; hang their lungs to the wall so that your vision and hearts will have a feast. What a delusion! All share the same ingredients. This is moreover flipside divine sign; sure for those who have vision. If you do not like, pass Darwin, pass materialism, but incubation is a fact. All living beings that have passed through mutations for millions of years have reverted their shapes and characteristics too.” Ironically, those who placed the planet earth at the part-way of universe centuries ago had problems with a revolving earth, and their ditto-head followers are now repeating the same thing. This time, instead of planets they are indulged in flipside human-centered fantasy: humans are entirely separate from other creatures; we are perfect beings, and we are the meta-species! We should not misconstrue and compromise our reasoning with primitive hormones. Opposition to scientific theories due to reliance on emotions shaped by culture and dogma has served as a major rationalization of problems in the past. The Quranic depiction of megacosm does not contradict the theory of evolution. In fact, it supports it: 15:26 We have created the human stuff from hardened soil of weather-beaten mud. This verse above, describing the mud with the word masnun, pulls our sustentation to the lengthy time span of creation.Megacosmfrom soil has two meanings. (1) soil as the substance of origin, and (2) soil as a place of origin. Both meanings could be true at the same time. We learn from other verses that soil is not the only substance used in our creation; water too is a vital ingredient. Like the Quran, the Bible mentions water and ground as the main origin or ingredients of life (Genesis 1:20-21;2:19). Our Creator started the biological incubation of microscopic organisms within layers of clay. Recent scientific research led some scientists to consider soil as the origin of life, since soil is a porous network of atoms serried geodesically within octahedral and tetrahedral forms. This diamond creates sliding and flexible layers that catalyze chemical reactions. Humans are the most wide fruits of organic life started millions years ago from layers of clay. See 29:18-20; 41:9-10; 7:69; 24:45; 32:7-9; 71:14-17. 24:45 God created every moving creature from water. So some of them move on their bellies, and some walk on two legs, and some walk on four. God creates whatever He wills. God is capable of all things. It is noteworthy that humans are included in the nomenclature of living creatures equal to physiological characteristics. This is in line with other verses that indicate an evolutionary method in creating Adam’s biological body. Millions of years ago, the worthiness of mammalian Homo Erectus to walk on two feet was considered a hair-trigger point in the incubation of the human smart-ass and the megacosm of Homo Sapiens. Walking on two feet might seem like a simple orthopedic change, but its effect on the neuropsychological transformation is huge. See 29:18-20; 41:9-10; 7:69; 15:26; 32:7-9; 71:14-17. 29:19 Did they not observe how God initiates the megacosm then He returns it? All that for God is easy to do. 29:20 Say, “Roam the earth and observe how the megacosm was initiated. Then God will establish the final design. God is capable of all things.” Archeological surveys show that the human race came into existence through mutation and natural selection starting from microscopic organisms.Installment71, which focuses on the story of Noah, informs us of our megacosm on this planet in terms of incubation rather than an instantaneous one. 71:13 “Why do you not seek God humbly.” 71:14 “While He created you in stages?” 71:15 “Did you not see how God created seven heavens in harmony?” 71:16 “He made the moon to illuminate in them, and He made the sun to be a lit flame?” 71:17 “God made you grow from the earth as plants.” 71:18 “Then He returns you to it, and He brings you out totally?” 71:19 “God made the land for you as a plain.” 71:20 “So that you may seek in it ways and paths?” 71:21 Noah said, “My Lord, they have disobeyed me and have followed one whose money and children only increased him in loss.”Incubationis an turnout line designed by God. The verses whilom provide an interesting undertone between Noah and incubation by mere juxtaposition. This hint is supported by flipside verse. From the pursuit verse we may infer that humans passed through a major incubation during Noah’s time: 7:69 “Are you surprised that a reminder has come to you from your Lord through a man from amongst you to warn you? Recall that he made you successors without the people of Noah, and He improved you in creation. So recall God’s blessings that you may succeed.” This verse evaluated together with the verses in installment 71, informs us of the evolutionary stage or genetic resurgence in our megacosm without Noah. I disagree with brother Shanavas’ interspersing quotes from hadith, which is contradictory hearsay reports falsely attributed to Muhammad centuries without his death.Undisciplinedto his expectations, they devalue the power of his argument. I moreover disagree with brother Shanavas regarding the meaning of khalifa. I cannot winnow humans to be the representative or successor of God. Humans are successors (khalifa) of a previous species, replacing them on top of the supplies chain. From the ravages of controllers (angels) who express their negative expectations of human behavior, we may infer that they had witnessed violent primates roaming the planet. 2:30 Your Lord said to the controllers, “I am placing a successor on earth.” They said, “Would You place in it he who would untruthful it, and shed blood, while we sing Your glory, and praise You?” He said, “I know what you do not know.” 2:31 He taught Adam the unravelment of all things, and then He displayed them to the controllers and said, “Inform Me the descriptions of these things if you are truthful.” Verse 2:31 pulls our sustentation to our innate worthiness to relate and discriminate by using sophisticated wresting skills and language. Shanavas’s typesetting provides persuasive arguments for evolution, while demonstrating that it was an wonted theory among Muslims long surpassing Darwin introduced overwhelming vestige for it. I hope that this typesetting will lead trendy Muslims to question the dogmas that contradict scientific facts. This will moreover serve as a reminder to the Western world well-nigh the roots of some of the important scientific discoveries. I would like to end this introduction with a quote from Dr. Shanavas: “In our survey of early Muslim thought and the study of the Quran, we have learned that Muslim scholars described the evolutionary process in detail. Although they and the Quran did not use the terminology used by scientists today, they believed in the ever-growing small-time tabbed life long surpassing modern scientists such as Stephen Jay Gould or Ernst Mayr. Not only did Western scholars hijack the fundamentals of the Muslim theory of incubation and present it as their own pristine idea, but they moreover excluded Muslims from their archives knowingly or unknowingly. For example, The Encyclopedia ofIncubationby Richard Milner, with foreword by Gould, excludes Muslim authors from the history of the theory of evolution. That omission is comparable to writing the history of the United States without mentioning George Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, or Abraham Lincoln.” Search English SearchWares0. ACTIVITIES (21) Conferences (10) 1. MANIFESTO (1) 2. CONSTITUTION (1) 3. AUDIO-VIDEO (6) 4. BOOKS (2) 5. EDIP YUKSEL (163) 0. Who is Edip Yuksel (1) 19: God's Signature (23) Christianity (3) Debates and Interviews (4) Ali Sina (1) Enemies of Muhammad (1) Family (9) Law and Politics (24) JournalWares(4) Organizations, sects and cults (3) Paranormal (2) Philosophy (20) Philosophy teaching (2) PrimeTreatise(1) QRT (5) Rainbow (16) Sala prayer (3) Terrorism (12) Theology (13) VisualWares(17) Warmongers (13) Women (5) 6. STUDENTS (3) Syllabi (3) 7. AFFILIATES (26) Abdun Nur (2) Abdur Rab (4) Aisha Musa (1) Asghar Ali Engineer (3) Basma Khalifa (1) Fereydoun Taslimi (1) Hasan Mahmoud (1) Irshad Manji (1) Kassim Ahmad (1) Lambda (3) Lily Ghobady (1) Reaz Islam (1) Ruby Amatulla (5) T.O. Shanavas (1) Tuna Ulas (1) 8. OTHER PROGRESSIVE AUTHORS (6) David Phillips (2) W. N. Arafat (1) 9. GENERAL (12) Law and Politics @fa (2) PORTUGUESE (2) Sonia Cihangir (1) BrainBowPress Amazon.com Widgets Sister Sites Caner Taslaman DeenResearchCenter Kurana Sor MPJP ProgressiveMuslims Quran's Message Quranic QuraniX QuranMiracles Rahman Tanzil.Net Edip YukselCreate Your Badge Recent Posts On it is Nineteen Lecture at British Parliament and Oslo Conference The Terrible Terrorist Test Muslim Reform orWiltExtinct From Gerd Puin to Edip Yuksel Erdogan and his thugs Reformist Translation vs Sectarian Translations NINETEEN: God’s Signature in Nature and Scripture. EXAMPLES: Sam Gerrans andLawmaking19 Year 1974: the Historic Discovery and Announcement by Rashad Khalifa Divine Logic Islamofacism-2 Islamofacism-1 Irshad Manji Edip Yuksel v. Ali Sina The illegitimate child of 9 strays Loneliness Uncovered Rashad Khalifa – Masjid Tucson 1919 Edip Yuksel What Motivates ISIS? In Defense of Rashad Khalifa versus Slanderers Idiots v Idiotmeters or I.Q. IQ TESTS Fatwa versus Islamic Reform Terror U.S. and Turkey on a Collision Course in Syria Turkey’sVisionlessFuture Lambda – Theological Questions for Yuksel Why the Sharia Law is so Dangerous for Our World Turkish tragedian sentenced to 3.5 years Your uncle or the sniveling shit-faced stranger rummaging the rubbish Warning to YouTube Turkish Team A Bloody Lie: Massacre of Banu Qurayza JewsSelf-rulingFlying Elephant Muhammad Wrote and Compiled the Quran حوريان‏ نارپستان همسال My younger son at Princeton Speech at Princeton University Jilbab Women in hell 37 Books Polycentric polity Turkey’s False Nostalgia Inherent Power Teoria Islãmica da evolução “Como podemos observar as orações Salaat seguindo unicamente o Alcorão?” Torture Shame for Humanity Matine Yuksel Meets Noam Chomsky A resume for higher Educational Version of David vs Goliath Naked Pope in a Glass House New Pope or Old Dope? Hitler and Ahmed Huber 10 Companies Profiting Most from Wars Wars, Wars, and increasingly Wars RainbowReportsModern Family Mixing Politics in Yogurt and Falafil God and Mathematics My Pant: “Watch your waist!” Holy Violence Motherland Nine Points of My life Real Terrorist My father and your father Palestinians are Thanking Israel and IDF Time Travel and Naked Reality The Jinni and You: Who is serving who? Enslaved or Exploited Women The Meaning of Life Department of Aggression The monstrous inequality Your Prayers are Accepted! The most immoral countries in income distribution Imagine a Religion Trilemma Of Sunni Scholars Monks and Robots The Qur’anists Listen to your treatise with the Sunnis! A New ‘Leadership Generation’ of Muslim Americans Best and Worst Places for Women Muslim Enlightenment: How do we know when it happens? You would probably Lynch Socrates, Crucify Jesus and Evict Muhammad Why Trash All the Hadiths? Arab Conspiracies Eternal Hell and the Merciful God? Sala: With Both Mind AndSoulDivine Will and Human FreedomSelf-rulingWill or Predestination? Destroying the Commons: On Shredding the Magna Carta Three Big Lies Perpetuated by the Rich Why Israel Receive such GlobalSustentationQuestions for Persuasive Paper Are these Zionist Quotes really Authentic? A Warning and Invitation to Muslim Women! Fethullah Gülen: a Dangerous Cult Leader Theometer or Sectometer Robert Spencer: a Crusader Riding a Catholic Zebra Robert Spencer and other Bloody Warmongers Fethullah Gulen: The Naked Sunni Caliph The Long Middle Finger at the European Parliament Practical Benefits ofLawmaking19 No Matter Who Is President of Iran, They Would Stone Me to Death Running Like Zebras (Documentary) The PrimeTreatiseFemale Circumcision Lottery Elections Feminism is a storm and rainbow of social and political incubation Prison as a Prism Paradoxes of Anarchism Are Human Rights A Western Concept? Universalits vs Universalism Hatemongers and Warmongers are going Crazy! Yes, I am a Kurd Cannibal Democracies Genetic and Rational Origins of Human Rights Biology of Human Rights Democracy andUntruthfulElite Capitalist Crusaders vs Feudal Mujahids Theopolitical Roots of the so-called “Islamic Terrorism” Edip Yuksel’s English and Turkish Books To Strike or Not to Strike: Edip Yuksel’s Speech at European Parliament Abu Ameenah Bilal Philips, a Hoaxer or a Murderer? Edip’s 10 Day European Tour (1-10 June, 2012) Cartoon and ShortMucosaCompetition on Muhammad (2012) Philosophy 122 (God, Mind, and Matter) Phil 120 (Logic) Syllabus Phil 101 SyllabusSquintAgain at that dot (Carl Sagan) Capital Punishment for Capitalism and the Epithet for its Tombstone Divine Stone; A mucosa by Hasan Mahmud The Making of a Documentary From Tucson to Changsha Why Study Philosophy, Love of Wisdom? Why philosophy does not prove anything? BigBang Biology And Law Seven Questions to Solve the Problem of Evil A family picture in 2006, San Diego Are Rules Futile or Helpful? My Normal and Paranormal Adventures in Kazakhstan: Paranormal: Jealous phenomenon, dejavu, ghosts, psychics, UFO.. Bigger Than Mushroom Is Watermelon an Animal? There is No Time For A Frozen Brain: Trimming Mysteries by a Wittgensteinian Slab Descartes vs. Berkeley: On the Two Corners of the Triangle Popper’s Theory of Epistemology Existentialism Versus Coexistentialism The Kangaroo Debate: Can Statements well-nigh God be Meaningful? The Spiritual Roots of Space Colonies Copernican Revolution Bourdieustic Thoughts: On Authorized Language and Uniform Rituals Happiness And Virtue as a Mean How much do you fit this description? A New Koran? The Fictional Muhammad? Freedom of thought, it’s your God-given right Understanding Spending In God’s Way: (Zakat Or Sadaqa) In The Quranic Light* Was Ayesha A Six-Year-Old Bride? Alcohol Makes You Smarter ORFlipsideBogus “Study” to Serve Alcohol Industry Edip Yuksel’s Channel at Youtube Reading Some Meccan Suras Muslim Reformists’ Conference at Oxford University Sign the Petition to addHair-triggerThinking Classes in K-12 “How can we Observe the Sala Prayers byPursuitthe Quran Alone?” Why the Zionist Enemies of the Prophet Muhammad LOVE HADITH planeIncreasinglythan Sunnis and Shiites? “Who influenced the uprising of Quranist movement?” Innumerate, Ignorant and Arrogant Sunni and Shiite Scholars Islamic Theory ofIncubationLisa Adams -2000 –SubconsciousSisters Is Rashad’s Translation of the Quran Error-free? What was the Name of the Last Prophet: Muhammad or Muhammed? Bloat and Corruption at the Pentagon Trojan Horses in yourSmart-assDogmatic Skepticism and OrganizedUnfaith(2 of 2) Dogmatic Skepticism and OrganizedUnfaith(1 of 2) Jury Reaches the Verdict: We are the Guilty US: Catalyst in MENA The Story of a Precious Crown Manifesto for Islamic Reform ‘One Million Strong in the Middle East and Beyond’ The real struggle starts without a tyrant regime gone The Constitution of the Republic of Peacemakers What the Tahrir Square Has Brought:SuffererPhilosophers Defend my Son, Yahya! OnStuffKafir Martyrdom And Houris A Day of Millon Days The American Janus Halal Turkey! (Audio, 16 November 1988) ThePreliminariesand Chronology of the Discovery Contextual Facts onLawmaking19 چقدر مسلمان هستید؟ دموکراسی و نخبگان فاسد Errors in English Translations of the Quran Prime number 19 My Normal and Paranormal Adventures Oxford, London and Istanbul – 2008 Myth of Moderate Drinking The Holy VirusesVeilingWatch-Watchers or Smell the Cheese Letter to Signs Magazine Edip’s Semi-personal Report (Oxford 2010) Brainbow Press BooksHair-triggerThinkers for Islamic Reform Eternal Hell and Merciful God? Is the Creature Prophecized in 27:82 Computer? BEWARE: Priests Are Singing Love, Again!FlipsideRunning Like Zebras A Miraculous Conspiracy Theory well-nigh Mecca 12 Hungry Men Make No Mistake: Iran is not Iraq Which One Do You See: Hell or Miracle? The 19 Rules of Inference No Contradiction in the Quran How Much Muslim Are You? Was the Discovery of theLawmaking19 a Coincidence? Fifteen Reasons Why Quran-only Islam A Cult infecting the InternationalPolityof Submitters 365 Day in the Quran Sit DownSurpassingReading this Letter © 1995-2014 19.org 13 visitors online now13 guests, 0 membersMax visitors today: 19 at 04:58 am UTCThis month: 19 at 10-01-2018 04:58 am UTCThis year: 114 at 06-28-2018 07:51 am UTCAll time: 312 at 12-19-2012 07:02 pm UTC